title page

THE PRINTER to the Reader.

THE TABLE OF CHAPTERS.

THE AVTHORS INTENTION IS DECLARED, AND M. D. Andrewes his interpretation of Pasce oues meas, examined, and confuted. FVRTHERMORE It is shewed, that he hath belyed S. Augustine, corrupted S. Ambrose, notably abused S. Cyril, vainly carped at a law in the Code, & foolishly approued the vnlawfull pro∣ceeding of Iustinian the Emperour against two Popes.

THE ANSVVERS OF M. ANDREWS TO Certayne places of the Councell of Calcedon are exa∣mined, and confuted. His notable fraud in diuers things, and especially in the allegation of a Canon of that Coun∣cell is discouered: and the supreme authority of the Sea Apostolike clearely proued out of the same Councell, and Canon.

M. D. ANDREVVS HIS ANSVVERES TO three places of the Fathers are examined. AND By the way the Cardinall is cleared from a false imputation of Iouinians heresy, and M. Andrews truly charged therewith. Finally all that which we teach concerning the Popes authority is necessarily deduced out of M. An∣drews his owne doctrine, and expresse words.

FOVRE OTHER PLACES OF THE FATHERS ARE DEBATED: And M. Andrews his Answers thereto confuted. With a Discouery of notable corruption and falsity in him: and of three manifest lyes within litle more then three lynes. AND By occasion thereof, it is also proued, that 8. Popes who liued in S. Augustines tyme, had, and exercysed an vniuersall and supreme Authority.

M^r. ANDREVVES HIS ANSWERS TO THREE OTHER PLACES Alleadged by the Cardinall out of the Fathers, are examined and confuted: and diuers absurdities discouered therin. AND Finally he is proued to be a Wrangler in the highest degree.

A FVRTHER MANIFESTATION OF MAISTER ANDREWS HIS Tryfling, wrangling, and fraudulent humour, by his An∣swers to other places of the Fathers, concerning Prayer to Saints, which he deuydeth into three rankes, whereof the two first are examined in this Chapter.

THE ANSVVERS OF M^r. ANDREVVS TO THE FATHERS OF THE THIRD RANKE, are examined, and found to be eyther impertinent, fraudulent, or most iniurious to them; namely to SAmbrose, whome he egregiously abuseth. ALSO It is euidently shewed, that the Inuocation of Saynts was generally practised and approued, as well by the ancient Fathers, as by all other faithfull Christians, in the Pri∣mitiue Church.

CERTAYNE OBIECTIONS OF M. ANDREWS AGAINST PRAYERS TO SAYNTS ARE ANSWERED: AND by the way, an Imposture of the pretended Bishops and Clergy of the Prouince of Canterbury in a Syno∣dicall Canon of theirs is discouered. AND Finally, M. Andrews is proued to haue notably wrangled, iuggled, and tryfled throughout this whole Controuersy.

THE CONCLVSION OF THIS ADIOYNDER, DEVIDED INTO TWO CHAPTERS. IN THIS, are detected diuers fraudes and shifts common to M. Andrews with M. Barlow; as to change the state of the question, to dissemble that which most importeth in the Cardinalls text and arguments; to abuse, wrest, bely and falsefy not only the Cardinall, but also the ancient Fathers, Councells, and holy Scriptures: and finally to face out matters impudētly for lack of proofs.

THAT M^r. ANDREVVS OVERTHROWETH HIS owne cause, and fortifieth ours, granting many im∣portant points of Catholike Religion. THAT he is turned Puritan in the point of the Kings Ecclesi∣asticall Supremacy, and betrayeth his Maiesties cause vnder hād, pretēding to defend it: & therfore is ney∣ther good English Protestāt, nor yet good Subiect. LASTLY what is the opinion of learned Strangers concer∣ning him, and his Booke: with a good aduise for a friendly farewell

AN APPENDIX TOVCHING A Register alleadged by M. Francis Mason, to proue THAT The first Protestant Byshops, in the reigne of Queene Elizabeth, had a lawfull Consecration.

Faultes escaped in the Printing.

A TABLE OF THE PRINCIPALL MATTERS HANDLED IN THIS ADIOYNDER.