The reports of that reverend and learned judge, Sir Richard Hutton Knight sometimes one of the judges of the common pleas : containing many choice cases, judgments, and resolutions in points of law in the severall raignes of King James and King Charles / being written in French in his owne hand, and now faithfully translated into English according to order.
- Title
- The reports of that reverend and learned judge, Sir Richard Hutton Knight sometimes one of the judges of the common pleas : containing many choice cases, judgments, and resolutions in points of law in the severall raignes of King James and King Charles / being written in French in his owne hand, and now faithfully translated into English according to order.
- Author
- England and Wales. Court of Common Pleas.
- Publication
- London :: Printed by T.R. for Henry Twyford, and Thomas Dring ...,
- 1656.
- Rights/Permissions
-
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.
- Subject terms
- Law reports, digests, etc. -- England.
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A45254.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"The reports of that reverend and learned judge, Sir Richard Hutton Knight sometimes one of the judges of the common pleas : containing many choice cases, judgments, and resolutions in points of law in the severall raignes of King James and King Charles / being written in French in his owne hand, and now faithfully translated into English according to order." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A45254.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 5, 2024.
Contents
- title page
- COƲRTEOƲS READER,
-
THE NAMES OF THE
PRINCIPALL CASES contained in this BOOKE. -
THE NAMES OF
CERTAINE CASES Cited,Obiter in the PRINCIPALL CASES. -
PASCH. 15 JACOBI.
-
Combes
versus Inwood. -
Trin. 14 Jac. Rotulo 769. Steward
versus Bishop. - Pasch. 15 Jac.
- Trin. 15 Jac. Resolved upon the Statute of 3 H. 7. Cap. 2.
- Statute 1 H. 4. Cap. 14.
-
Mich. 15 Jac. Andrews
versus Hacker. -
Mich. 14 Jac. Rot. 3297. Shaw
versus Taylor. -
Pasch. 14 Jac. Rot. 907. Norris
versus Stapes. -
Mich. 15 Jac. Rot. 2327. Dorrell
versus Andrews. -
Trin. 14 Jac. Rot. 755 Swaine
versus Holman. -
Mich. 15 Jac. Rot. 1634. Gibbs
versus Davie. -
Micih 14 Jac. Rot. 953. Leigh
versus Paine. -
Mich. 11 Jac. Rot. 318. Agars
versus Lisle. -
Hil. 15 Jac. Coble
versus Allen. -
Harding
versus Bodman. -
Trin. 15 Jac. Rot. 1968. Speake
versus Richards. -
Mich. 15 Jac. Rot. 636. Stone
versus Roberts. -
Hil. 15 Jac. Rot. 710. Crawley
versus Kingswell. - 26 Eliz. Certain Cases vouched in an Action for words.
-
Banco Regis 30 Eliz. George
versus Whitlock. -
Hil. 30 Eliz, B. R. Walcot Plaintiff
versus Hind. - Trin. 37 Eliz. Brookes Case.
-
Mich. 37 and 38 Eliz. Charter
versus Hunter. -
Trin. 13 Jac. Rot. 650. Heard
versus Baskerfield. -
Pasch. 16 Jac. Drury
versus Fitch. -
Hil. 15 Jac. Rot. 906. Smith
versus Stafford. -
Trin. 6 Jac. Jurden
versus Stone. - Pasch. 16 Jac. Rot. 444. Blands Case.
-
Trin. 16 Jac. Darcy
versus Askwith. - Edmonds Case.
- Mich, 16 Jac. Staffords Case.
- Sir Walter Rawleys Case.
- Bishop and others.
- Mich. 16 Jacobi.
- Mich. 16 Jacobi. Conesbies Case.
-
Trin. 16 Jac. Rot. 954. Kind
versus Ammery. - Booton against the Bishop of Rochester
-
Trin. 16 Jac. Rot. 1999. Eire
versus Bannester. -
Mich. 16 Jac. Easington
versus Boucher. -
Hil. 12 Jac. Rot. 3007. Reyner
versus Waterhouse. -
Hil. 16 Jac. Bigg
versus Malin. -
Brook
versus Groves. -
Egerton
versus Egerton. - Cardinals Case.
-
Pasch. 17 Jac. Allaboyter
versus Clifford. - George Andrews Case.
-
Trin. 16 Jac. Wolfe
versus Heydon. -
Coppledick
versus Tansey. -
Smith
versus Linsey. -
Cony
versus Cony. -
Trin. 17 Jacobi. Smith
versus Sir John Boucher. Mich. 16 Jac. Rot. 3339. - Burglary.
-
Mich. 15 Jac. Adavis
versus Flemming. -
Mich. 17 Jac. Bayshaw
versus Walker. -
Green
versus Harrington. -
Trin. 17 Jac. Rot. 1849. Castilion
versus Smith. - Pies Case.
- Blackburnes Case.
- Trin. 17 Jac. Whittingtons Case.
- Ruggles Case.
-
Pasch. 18 Jac. Mason
versus Thompson. -
Trin. 18 Jac. Hall
versus Woollen. -
Mich. 18 Jac. Clerk
versus Wood. -
Mich. 16 Jac. Rot. 2344. Lamb
versus Thompson. -
Mich. 18 Jac. Powell
versus Ward. -
Sherley
versus Underhill. - Mich. 18 Jac. Sir Thomas Wentworths Case.
- Davies Case.
-
Pasch. 15 Jac. Rot. 1714. Cartwright
versus Underhill - Hill. 18. Jac. The Earl of Clanrickards Case.
-
Hil. 18 Jac. Rot. 739. Bridgeland
versus Post. -
Pasch. 19 Jac. King
versus Bowen. -
Pasch. 19 Jac. Tippin
versus King. -
Mich. 18 Jac. Rot. 2805. Pitt
versus Chick. -
Trin. 19 Jac. Wilson
versus Stubbs. -
Mich. 19 Jac. Allen
versus Swift. -
Mayes
versus Sidley. -
Pasch. 20 Jac. Suggs
versus Sparrow. -
Hil. 19 Jac. Rot. 312. or 3125. Walrond
versus Hill. -
Hord
versus Cordery. A President was shewn which was thus. -
Trin. 20 Jac. Hawkins
versus Cutts. -
Trin. 20 Jac. Whiteguift
versus Eldersham. - Trin. 20 Jac. Sherwells Case.
-
Trin. 20 Jac. Francis Curle
versus James Cookes. -
Hil. 17 Jac. Empson
versus Bathurst. -
Mich. 20 Jac. Bullen
versus Gervis. -
Lightfoot
versus Brightman. -
Mich. 20 Jac. Chittle
versus Sammon. -
Fletcher
versus Harcot. - Mich. 20 Jac. Parkers Case.
-
Mich. 10 Jac. Rot. 641. Poole
versus Reynold. -
Hil. 10 Jac. Meredith
versus Bonill. - Griggs Case.
- Hil. 20 Jac.
-
Howell
versus Auger. - The Vacation after Hil. 20 Jac.
-
Mich. 20 Jac. Rot. 2805. Bawtry
versus Skarlet. -
Pach. 19 Jac. Rot. 3014. 21 Jac. Jennings
versus Pitman. - Trin 20 Jac.
-
Trin. 19 Jac. Rot. 1734. Blemmer Hasset
versus Humberstone. -
Mich. 21 Jac. Aris
versus Higgins. -
Rud
versus the Bishop of Lincoln. -
Hil. 20 Jac. Rot. 1942. Pleydell
versus Gosmoore. -
Entred Pasch. 18 Jac. Rot. 650. Treherne
versus Cleybrooke. -
Hickson
versus Hickson. - Mich. 21 Jac. Linleys Case.
-
Bickner
versus Wright. -
Trin. 22 Jac. Goldenham
versus Some. -
Potter
versus Browne. -
Mich. 22 Jac. Methell
versus Peck. - Mich. 22 Jac.
-
Combes
-
THE FIRST YEAR OF KING CHARLES.
-
Termino Pasch. Hitcham
versus Brook. -
Flight
versus Gresh. -
Hil. 21 Jac. Rot. 3150. Trevors
versus Michelborne. -
Hil. 1 Car. Uvedall
versus Tindall. Enter Hil. 21 Jac. Rot 705. -
Hil. 1 Car. Townley
versus Steele. -
Hil. 1 Car. Beverley
versus Power. -
Pasch. 2 Car. Crane
versus Crampton. -
Laicon
versus Barnard. - Pasch. 2 Car. Wades Case.
-
Trin. 2 Car. Farrington
versus Arrundell. Entred Hil. 22 Jac. Rot. 4462. -
Clotworthy
versus Clotworthy. Amendments. -
Hil. 18 Jac. Rot. 67
. Walker versus Worsley. Amendments. -
Hil. 9 Jac. Rot. 516. Govard
versus Dennet. - Mich. 16 Jac. Rot. 581. Arrowsmith's Case.
-
Pasch. 12 Jac. Rot. 420. Godhow
versus Bennet. -
Hil. 12 Jac. Rot. 420. Parker
versus Parker. -
Mich. 2 Car. Crocker
versus Kelsey -
Mich. 2 Car. Franklin
versus Bradell. -
Hil. 2 Car. Hearne
versus Allen. Entred 22 Jac: Rot: 1875. - Hil. 2 Car. Sir Charles Howards Case.
- The Earl of Lincolns Case.
-
Hil. 2 Car. Winsmore
versus Hobart. Trin. 27 Eliz. Rot. 850. - Pasch. 3. Car. Hartox and Cock's Case. Entred Pasch. 2 Car. Rot. 1761.
- Chidley's Case.
-
Trin. 3 Car. Rot. Humbleton
versus Buck. -
Trin 3. Car. Chapman
versus Chapman. -
Trin. 3 Car. Stephens
versus Oldsworth. -
Mich. 3 Car. Young
versus Young. -
Mich. 3 Car. Wolfe
versus Hole. -
Hil. 2. Car. Rot. 565. Hilton
versus Paule. -
Hil. 3 Car. Peto
versus Pemmerton. Mich. 3 Car. Rot. 414. -
Hil. 3 Car. Sandford
versus Cooper. -
Hil. 3 Car. Holt
versus Sambach. Trin. 2 Car. Rot. 731. -
Chichley
versus the Bishop of Ely. - Pasch. 4 Car. Congham's Case.
-
Farrington
versus Caymer. - June 19. An. 22. Jac.
-
Mich. 4 Car. Mackerney
versus Ewrin. -
Turner
versus Hodges. - Hil. 4 Car.
-
Pasch. 5 Car. Paston
versus Utber. -
Trin. 5 Car. Starkey
versus Tayler. -
Hil. 3 Car Rot. 1302. Watt
versus Maydewell. -
Mich. 5 Car. Baker
versus Johnson. -
Mich. 5 Car. Bill
versus Lake. -
Mich. 4 Car. Treford
versus Holmes. - Mich. 5 Car. A strange increase of Water in Westminster-Hall.
-
Freeman
versus Stacy. Mich. 5 Car. -
Trin. 6 Car. Shervin
versus Cartwright. -
Cook
versus Cook. - Mich. 6 Caroli.
-
Babbington
versus Wood. -
Wilson
versus Briggs. -
Trin. 8 Car. Purnell
versus Bridge, Hil. 6 Car. Rot. 1235. -
Mich. 8 Car. Harbert
versus Angell. -
Ram
versus Lamley. -
Mich. 8 Car. Lamb
versus West. Trin. 8 Car. Rot. 333. - The Lord Audley's Case.
-
Pasch. 7 Car. Risam
versus Goodwin. Mich. 5 Car. Rot. 2512. -
Hil. 7 Car. Napper
versus Sanders. Pasch. 6 Car. Rot. 1148. -
Pasch. 8 Car. Metcalfe
versus Hodgson. -
Mich. 8 Car. Hickes
versus Mounford. Trin. 7 Car. Rot. 514. -
Mich. 8 Car. Col.
versus Wilkes. - Pasch. 9 Car. Strilley's Case.
-
Pasch. 9 Car. Glasier
versus Heliar. -
Smith
versus Cornelius. -
Hil. 9 Jac. Edwards
versus Laurence. Trin. 9 Car. Rot. 2488. -
Pasch. 10 Car. Dawe
versus Palmer. - Mich. 10 Car. Deanes Case.
-
Mich. 10 Car. Knight
versus Copping. -
Pasch. 11 Car. Baker
versus Hucking. - Mich. 11 Car. Lashbrookes Case.
- Hil. 11 Car. Davies Case.
-
Mich. 7 Car. Rot. 1097. Alston
versus Andrew. - Trin. 12 Car.
- Mich. 14 Car.
- Lord Digbies Case.
- Trin. 12 Car.
-
Hil. 12 Car. Souser
versus Burton. -
Hugles
versus Drinkwater. - An. 2. Car.
- Mich. 3 Car.
- Sir Richard Champions Case.
-
Mich. 4 Car. Jones
versus Powell.
-
Termino Pasch. Hitcham
-
THE TABLE Reciting the heads of all the PRINCIPAL
CASES. in this BOOK. - Errata.