Quakerism no popery, or, A particular answere to that part of Iohn Menzeis, professor of divinity in Aberdeen, (as he is called) his book, intituled Roma mendax Wherein the people called Quakers are concerned, whom he doth accuse as holding many popish doctrins, and as if Quakerism, (so he nick-names our religion,) were but popery-disguised. In which treatise his alleadged grounds for this his assertion, are impartialy and fairly examined and confuted: and also his accusation of popery against us, justly retorted upon himself, and his bretheren. By George Keith.

Add to bookbag

Author:	Keith, George, 1639?-1716.
Title:	Quakerism no popery, or, A particular answere to that part of Iohn Menzeis, professor of divinity in Aberdeen, (as he is called) his book, intituled Roma mendax Wherein the people called Quakers are concerned, whom he doth accuse as holding many popish doctrins, and as if Quakerism, (so he nick-names our religion,) were but popery-disguised. In which treatise his alleadged grounds for this his assertion, are impartialy and fairly examined and confuted: and also his accusation of popery against us, justly retorted upon himself, and his bretheren. By George Keith.
Rights/Permissions:	The University of Michigan Library provides access to these keyboarded and encoded editions of the works for educational and research purposes. These transcriptions are believed to be in the public domain in the United States; however, if you decide to use any of these transcriptions, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact eebotcp-info@umich.edu. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact LibraryIT-info@umich.edu. This statement does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Print source:	Quakerism no popery, or, A particular answere to that part of Iohn Menzeis, professor of divinity in Aberdeen, (as he is called) his book, intituled Roma mendax Wherein the people called Quakers are concerned, whom he doth accuse as holding many popish doctrins, and as if Quakerism, (so he nick-names our religion,) were but popery-disguised. In which treatise his alleadged grounds for this his assertion, are impartialy and fairly examined and confuted: and also his accusation of popery against us, justly retorted upon himself, and his bretheren. By George Keith. Keith, George, 1639?-1716. [London: s.n.], Printed in the year, 1675.
Subject terms:	Menzeis, John, 1624-1684. -- Roma mendax -- Early works to 1800. Society of Friends -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
URL:	https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A47166.0001.001
How to cite:	For suggestions on citing this text, please see Citing the TCP on the Text Creation Partnership website.

Table of Contents

View entire text

title page

The Epistle to the Reader.

THE CONTENTS.

Quakerism no Popery.

SECTION I. Containing the Introduction, and Occasion of this Treatise.

SECT. II. Concerning our alleadged agreeing with Pa∣pists about the Scriptures▪ where also some things are opened concerning the rule of Faith, and im∣mediat Revelation.

SECT. III. Where the alleadged agreement about Perfection is considered, and ex∣amined.

SECT. IV. Where the alleadged agreement about Iustification is considered and ex∣amined.

SECT. V. Where the alleadged agreement about Good-Works, is considered and examined.

SECT. VI. Concerning the Apocryphall-Books.

SECT. VII. Where the alleadged agreement, as if the efficacy of Grace, depen∣ded upon Mans FREE-WILL, is considered and answered.

SECT. VIII. Where the alleadged Agreement about the Apostacy of the Saints, is considered and examined.

SECT. IX. Where the alleadged Agreement about Indwelling—Concupiscence is considered and answered.

SECT. X. Where severall other alleadged lesser agreements in point of Practise, and divers other Calumnies of that kind, are considered and examined.

SECT. XI. Wherein I. M. his acknowledgment concerning the Ministeriall Succes∣sion through the Church of Rome is briefly considered, and the Impu∣tation of Popery in that respect, justly retorted upon him.

SECT. XII, BY ANOTHER HAND. Wherein we are further vindicated from the Imputation of Popery unjustly cast upon us, and how much more truely it agreeth to our Oppo∣sers, is evidenced by a short Ac∣count of many weighty particu∣lars, wherein they agree with Ro∣manists against us.

SECT. XIII. Containing the Conclusion by way of Epilogue; wherein the whole is briefly resumed, and the falsness of the Accusation, as well as the justness of our Retortion clearly presented to the view of the Serious and Impartial-Reader.

Certain QUERIES, concerning a CHRISTIANS-RULE.

to the reader

ERRATA.