A discourse proving the divine institution of water-baptism wherein the Quaker-arguments against it are collected and confuted : with as much as is needful concerning the Lord's supper / by the author of The snake in the grass.
- Title
- A discourse proving the divine institution of water-baptism wherein the Quaker-arguments against it are collected and confuted : with as much as is needful concerning the Lord's supper / by the author of The snake in the grass.
- Author
- Leslie, Charles, 1650-1722.
- Publication
- London :: Printed for C. Brome ... W. Keblewhite ... and H. Hindmarsh ...,
- 1697.
- Rights/Permissions
-
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.
- Subject terms
- Baptism -- Early works to 1800.
- Society of Friends -- Controversial literature.
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A47740.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"A discourse proving the divine institution of water-baptism wherein the Quaker-arguments against it are collected and confuted : with as much as is needful concerning the Lord's supper / by the author of The snake in the grass." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A47740.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 5, 2024.
Contents
- title page
- table of contents
- erratum
- publisher's advertisement
- A PREFACE.
-
SECT. I. That
Matth. xxviii. 19. was meant ofWater-Baptism. -
SECT. II.
- I. That
CHRIST did PractiseWater-Baptism. - II. That the Apostles did it after
Him. - III. That the
Catholick Church have done it afterThem.
- I. That
-
SECT. III. That
Baptism must beOutward andVisible, because it is an Ordinance appointed whereby toInitiate Men into anOutward andVisible Society, which is theChurch. -
SECT. IV.
Quakers say, 1st, That theBAPTISM commandedMatth. xxviii. 19. was only meant of theInward andSpiritual Baptism,with the Holy Ghost. -
SECT. V. The great Argument of the
Quakers againstWa∣ter-Baptism is this:John 'sBaptism isceased: ButJohn 'sBaptism wasWater-Baptism: There∣foreWater-Baptism isceased. This their Learn∣edBarclay makes use of.But, -
SECT. VI. That
Christ and theApostles did notBaptize withJohn 's Baptism. -
SECT. VII. The
Quakers Master-Objection from 1Cor. i. 14. I thank GOD that I Baptized none of you, butCri∣spus andGaius. AndVer. 17. For Christ sent me not to Baptize, but to Preach the Gospel. -
SECT. VIII. Objection from 1
Pet. iii. 21. -
SECT. IX. The Quaker-Objection from,
Eph. iv. 5. -
SECT. X. An Objection from
Heb. vi. 1. -
SECT. XI. The
Quaker -Objection, That there are noSigns un∣der theGospel. -
The Conclusion. Shewing the
Necessity ofWater-Baptism. - To be added to the End of Sect. VIII. p. 34.