The relection of a conference touching the reall presence. Or a bachelours censure of a masters apologie for Doctour Featlie.: bachelours censure of a masters apologie for Doctour Featlie. / By L.I. B. of Art, of Oxford.
- Title
- The relection of a conference touching the reall presence. Or a bachelours censure of a masters apologie for Doctour Featlie.: bachelours censure of a masters apologie for Doctour Featlie. / By L.I. B. of Art, of Oxford.
- Author
- Lechmere, John.
- Publication
- At Doway :: by Laurence Kellam,
- M. DC. XXXV. [1635]
- Rights/Permissions
-
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further further information or permissions.
- Subject terms
- Lord's Supper -- Real presence
- Waferer, Myrth, -- 1609 or 10-1680. -- Apologie for Daniel Featley.
- Link to this Item
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/a72527.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"The relection of a conference touching the reall presence. Or a bachelours censure of a masters apologie for Doctour Featlie.: bachelours censure of a masters apologie for Doctour Featlie. / By L.I. B. of Art, of Oxford." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A72527.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 2, 2024.
Contents
- title page
- THE PREFACE.
- APPROBATIO.
- THE ERRATA.
- note
- title page
- TO THE READER.
-
Heer's Rhodes. - text
- imprimatur
- title page
- TO THE READERS OF THE TITLE.
-
TO MASTER MIRTH VVAFERER In oxford; or Odiham, or els-vvhere;
Quocumque sub axe; , More vvitt, and more grace. -
text
- ANSWER TO THE EPISTOLARIE PROLOGVE.
- THE CENSVRE OF THE APOLOGIE.
- answer to argument - 1
-
The second Argument was of Saint Augustines words of eating the flesh of the sonne of man,
Figura est &c. lib. 3. de doct. Christiana. And it wasanswered that this ea∣ting is figuratiue according to themanner, for this flesh is not diui∣ded (in the eating) in it self; as other flesh: but not figuratiue accor∣ding tothe thing, the flesh. - The third argument was about the killing letter; out of Origen, who by the killing letter meant (as it was Answered) not the Catho∣like sence, but the Caphar∣naiticall.
-
The fourth
Argument was taken out ofGratian and theGlosse, that the Heauenlie bread is the flesh of Christsecundum quē∣dam modum. It wasAnswe∣red that theGlosse which doth vse the wordSacramentum, speakes of that which isSacra∣mentum tantum: andGratian of theCanon, saith the Heauen∣lie bread which includes the flesh of Christ, is the visible flesh or bodiesecundùm quemdam mo∣dum. -
The Fift
obiection was thatHoc stands for bread, because the Fa∣thers, sometimes call the Sacra∣ment by that name, and the pro∣noune relates to nothing els. TheAnswer was thatHoc, (who∣se signification of it self is confu∣sed) relates vnto thething which is vnder thespecies when the forme is whollie vttered; and that this thing is Heauenlie bread and by the Fathers so called. -
The sixt
Argument was groun∣ded vpon the wordTestament in S. Luke: where it is taken, as my LordAnswered, for an authentick signe of the inte∣riour will or sentence: and in this sence our Sauiours blood, as vnder the forme of wine, istestamentum, a Testament. -
The seuenth
Argument was ta∣ken out of that place ofS. Ma∣thew where the cup our Sauiour drank of, is called thefruit of the vine. It wasanswered that there were two cups, the Le∣gall and the Sacramentall; and that those wordes (as appeares by by the relation ofSaint Luke ) were meant of the Legall cup though it had beene easie to ans¦wer the Argument had thebeene vnderstood of the Sacr ¦mentall.