The Exercitation answered, in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd.

Title

The Exercitation answered, in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd.

Publication

London :: Printed for John Wright at the Kings Head in the old Bailey,

1650.

Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms

Gee, Edward, 1613-1660. -- Early works to 1800.

Allegiance -- Early works to 1800.

Oaths -- England -- Early works to 1800.

Obedience -- Religious aspects -- Christianity -- Early works to 1800.

Great Britain -- History -- Commonwealth and Protectorate, 1649-1660 -- Early works to 1800.

Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1649-1660 -- Early works to 1800.

Link to this Item

https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A84287.0001.001 content_copy

Cite this Item

"The Exercitation answered, in the assertions following made good against it. 1 That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really no usurpation, by any thing that he hath said to prove it such. 2 That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3 That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A84287.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 7, 2024. content_copy

Contents

• title page
• THE EXERCITATION answered, in the ASSERTIONS following, made good against it.
  • CHAP. I. A taste of the Exercitator and Exercitation.
  • CHAP. II. That the Ʋsurpation pretended is really no Ʋsurpation.
  • CHAP. III. That the Oathes objected oblige not against obedience to the present Government.
  • CHAP. IIII. That obedience is due to Powers in possession, though unlawfully entred.